Securities Lawyer Blog | Victim of Fraud?

TAG | Auction rate securities lawyer

Oct/11

25

Colorado Settles E*Trade Auction Rate Securities

Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA

The following press release was from the State of Colorado regarding a settlement with E*Trade over the firm’s auction rate securities issues.

Colorado Securities Commissioner Announces Settlement of its Auction Rate Securities Enforcement Action against E*TRADE

The Colorado Securities Commissioner Fred Joseph announced today that a settlement in principle has been reached between E*TRADE Securities, LLC, and the Colorado Division of Securities settling its enforcement action against E*TRADE related to its sale of auction rate securities to Colorado investors. Under the settlement agreement, E*TRADE agreed to buy back approximately $3.5 million worth of auction rate securities from Colorado investors who found themselves unable to sell their securities after they had been frozen in the auction rate securities (“ARS”) market. This settlement also includes a broader agreement by E*TRADE to return approximately $100 million to the firm’s clients on a nationwide basis.

This settlement concludes the Division’s enforcement action initiated to sanction E*TRADE’s license in Colorado for alleged violations of the Colorado Securities Act in connection with the sale of auction rate securities to Colorado investors. A hearing was held before Administrative Law Judge Robert Spencer beginning June 6, 2011. On August 12, 2011, Judge Spencer issued his initial decision finding that E*TRADE willfully misrepresented material facts in connection with the sales of auction rate securities to Colorado investors and failed to adequately supervise its financial advisors who sold the auction rate securities to Colorado investors. The Initial Decision by Judge Spencer is not an effective or final order, but was pending with the Securities Commissioner for issuance of a final order.

This settlement also concluded a multi-state investigation of E*TRADE for its role in the sale of auction rate securities for making misleading representations to certain of its clients that auction rate securities were the same as “7 day paper” and were a suitable alternative to money market funds for liquidity purposes. It did so through its sales force, some of whom represented to certain investors that auction rate securities were safe investments for cash management purposes. The auction rate securities markets froze in February of 2008, triggering a flood of complaints from investors who could not withdraw money from their accounts. States received complaints from a wide range of investors who suffered significant financial damage because the money they were told was liquid was tied up in the frozen ARS market.
E*TRADE has agreed to make Colorado investors whole,” said Commissioner Joseph. “Getting this relief for investors was our ultimate goal. I credit the hard work and persistence of the Staff of the Division and the lawyers from the Colorado Attorney General’s office who represented us in our action for achieving this positive result for investors.”

These terms of the settlement include E*TRADE’s agreement to buy back at par all outstanding auction rate securities purchased through the firm by individual investors prior to February 11, 2008, fully reimburse all individual investors who sold their auction rate securities at a discount, reimburse certain investors for the cost of loans after the investor took out a loan from E*TRADE because their securities were frozen, and pay a penalty and the costs of the legal action.

The settlement is the fifteenth that the Securities Commissioner has entered. Previous settlements include Deutsche Bank Securities, Citigroup Global Markets, Bank of America Securities, Credit Suisse Securities, JP Morgan Chase, Merrill Lynch, RBC Capital Markets, UBS Securities, Wachovia Securities, Stifel Nicolaus, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, TD Ameritrade, and Wells Fargo. The Division continues to investigate possible misconduct by other firms.

Securities Attorney, Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, has represented clients nationwide. If you feel you have become a victim of auction-rate securities losses through E*Trade Financial Corporation, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.securitieslawyer.com

Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Sep/11

15

SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, SunTrust Investment Services Fined a Total of $5 Million by FINRA for Auction Rate Securities Violations

Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA

WASHINGTON — In an article from FINRA’s website, The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced that it has fined SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (SunTrust RH) and SunTrust Investment Services, Inc. (SunTrust IS) for violations related to the sale of auction rate securities (ARS). SunTrust RH, which underwrote the ARS, was fined $4.6 million for failing to adequately disclose the increased risk that auctions could fail, sharing material non-public information, using sales material that did not adequately disclose the risks associated with ARS, and having inadequate supervisory procedures and training concerning the sales and marketing of ARS. SunTrust IS was fined $400,000 for having deficient ARS sales material, procedures and training.

 The FINRA article stated that FINRA found beginning in late summer 2007, SunTrust RH became aware of stresses in the ARS market that raised the risk that auctions might fail. At the same time, SunTrust RH was told by its parent, SunTrust Bank, to reduce its use of the bank’s capital and began to examine whether it had the financial capability in the event of a major market disruption to support all ARS in which it acted as the sole or lead broker-dealer. As these stresses increased, the firm failed to adequately disclose the increased risk to its sales representatives while encouraging them to sell SunTrust RH-led ARS issues in order to reduce the firm’s inventory. As a result, certain SunTrust RH sales representatives continued to sell these ARS as safe and liquid. In February 2008, SunTrust RH stopped supporting ARS auctions, knowing that those auctions would fail and the ARS would become illiquid.

Both SunTrust RH and SunTrust IS used advertising and marketing materials that were not fair and balanced, and did not provide a sound basis for evaluating all the facts about purchasing ARS. Specifically, the materials did not contain adequate disclosure of all the risks of ARS, including adequately disclosing the risk that ARS auctions could fail, rendering the investments illiquid for substantial periods of time. Both firms failed to maintain adequate supervisory procedures and training concerning their sales and marketing of ARS.

The FINRA article adds that FINRA found on Feb. 13, 2008, SunTrust RH shared material non-public information regarding the potential refinancing of certain ARS issues with SunTrust Bank, which was contemplating investing in ARS. This information was material because SunTrust Bank was assured that if the auction market froze, it would likely be able to dispose of the illiquid ARS on the date the ARS was refinanced.

 Brad Bennett, FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement, said, “SunTrust Robinson Humphrey and SunTrust Investment Services withheld information about the ARS market which prevented their sales representatives from making proper recommendations and their customers from making informed decisions about ARS. Because of that, the customers were left holding illiquid securities when the auctions failed.”

 FINRA goes on to say that this action concludes the agreements in principle with FINRA that were previously announced in Sept. 2008 and withdrawn in May 2009. SunTrust RH and SunTrust IS voluntarily repurchased approximately $381 million and $262 million of ARS, respectively, from their customers after FINRA began its investigation. In addition, as part of the settlements, the firms will participate in a special FINRA-administered arbitration program for eligible investors to resolve investor claims for consequential damages.

 In concluding these settlements, the firms neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA’s findings.  This information was obtained from FINRA’s website.

Securities Attorney, Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, has represented clients nationwide. If you feel you have become a victim of  SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, SunTrust Investment Services Inc., relating to the sale of auction rate securities (ARS), please call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses.  To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.securitieslawyer.com

Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA  the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Find it!

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me
To top