TAG | finra securities arbitration
14
FINRA Fines Broker $1.8mill in Sale of ETFs
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
Nicholas Rowe and his firm, Focus Capital Wealth Management, Inc. of Bedford, New Hampshire, were found liable in a case alleging negligence, civil fraud, and other misdeeds, involving the sale of risky ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) to nine investors, according to a ruling by a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel. Some of these investors were in their fifties and sixties, including two widows. Rowe was ordered to pay $1.8 million to the investors.
The Reuters article goes on to explain that leveraged and inverse ETFs were designed to amplify short-term returns by using debt and derivatives and are considered more suitable for professional traders than for long-term investors or anyone does not want a high-risk portfolio. In 2009, FINRA and other regulators began issuing warnings about the sale of leveraged and inverse ETFs because they worried that brokers were selling them to buy-and-hold investors – a strategy likely to cause heavy losses.
The Reuters article says that FINRA arbitration may be the last hope for some investors whose advisers guided them to leveraged and inverse ETFs and then mismanaged the investments.
Investors in the Rowe case were all heavily concentrated in leveraged and inverse ETFs. That strategy is nearly guaranteed to lead to losses, since the investments effectively require betting on whether the market is going up or down.
Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, represents clients nationwide. If you invested with Nicholas Rowe or Focus Capital Wealth Management, Inc., or had losses in other leveraged and inverse ETFs, call: 888-760-6552, or you may visit our website and complete the online form at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · elder abuse in investments · exchange traded fund · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra securities arbitration · Focus Capital Wealth Mangement Inc · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · inverse ETFs · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · Leveraged ETFs · leveraged inverse ETF's · Nicholas Rowe · Nicholas Rowe Bedford New Hampshire · Nicholas Rowe fined by FINRA for ETF · Unsuitable investments to elderly
Last week LPL Financial Holdings agreed to pay $2.5 million in fines and restitution for improperly supervising brokers who sold non-traded real estate investment trusts. (Please note that LPL neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing.) These non-traded REITs are high-yielding and very popular. These non-traded REITs have jumped about 50% since 2009, to $65 billion. They are difficult to track and value, since they don’t trade on public exchanges.
Below is a list of REITs, some of which LPL Financial Holdings were fined for allegedly selling with improper supervision to clients who were not interested in taking the risks with their conservative portfolios.
American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value, Inc.
American Realty Capital Global Trust, Inc.
ARC Retail Centers of America
American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc.
ARC Healthcare Trust
American Realty Capital Phillips Edison
Shopping Center REIT
American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. Update
American Realty Capital New York Recovery REIT
ARC Property Trust, Inc.
Arciterra National REIT, LP
Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT II, Inc.
Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc.
Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT
Clearwater Opportunity REIT
CNL Global Growth Trust, Inc.
CNL Global Income Trust, Inc.
Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc.
Hines Global REIT, Inc. 2012
Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.
Inland Diversified REIT
Lightstone Value Plus REIT II Update
NetREIT Dubose Model Home REIT, Inc.
NetREIT $200,000,000 Stock Offering Update
O’Donnell Strategic Industrial REIT, Inc.
Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc.
RREEF Property Trust, Inc.
UCM US RMBS Opportunity REIT, Inc.
US Apartment Investors 2010, Inc.
Wells Core Office Income REIT
If you purchased these or other REITs, and sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call Soreide Law Group, PLLC, for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website and complete our online form at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · clients with low risk portfolios · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · high risk investments · high-risk private placements · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · LPL · LPL Financial LLC · LPL fined over REIT sales · LPL REIT investors · LPL sale to elderly · LPL sued by Massachusetts · non-traded real estate investment trusts · Non-traded REIT loss lawyer · nontraded REIT loss · Nontraded REITs · Real Estate Investment Trust · securities lawyer · Unsuitable investments to elderly
8
FBI, SEC and FINRA Investigating Tommy Belesis’ Firm, John Thomas Financial
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
In an article, Feb. 7, 2013, in the New York Post, it was reported that (broker-dealer owner), Anastasios “Tommy” Belesis’ firm, John Thomas Financial, is being investigated by the FBI, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. (FINRA).
Mr. Belesis has made many media appearances on cable business/financial shows.
According to FINRA’s BrokerCheck, S.W. Bach & Co. fired him in 2005 for “inaccurate representation of identity to customer.” In 2001, a client sued him and a firm for $750,000 for churning and a FINRA arbitration panel later awarded the client $259,000. Mr. Belesis and firms he’s worked for have settled two other FINRA arbitration claims for nearly $100,000. Belesis paid $46,000 as his share of the settlements.
John Thomas’ FINRA record shows failures to disclose fees to clients about transaction charges. Arkansas Securities Department fined John Thomas $25,000 last year for allegedly not disclosing to clients handling fees for stock orders. The Connecticut Banking Department fined the firm $20,000 over similar failures on fee disclosures, and FINRA fined it $275,000 for “postage and handling” violations.
If you have been a client of Anastasios “Tommy” Belesis, and/or his firm, John Thomas Financial, and experienced financial losses call a securities lawyer at (888) 760-6552 or visit http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
Anastasios Belesis · broker churning accounts · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · failure to disclose fees by broker to client · failure to supervise brokers · fee disclosures by bokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA brokercheck · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · investigation into John Thomas Financial · John Thomas Financial investigation · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities lawyer · Stock fraud lawyer · Tommy Belesis · Tommy Belesis John Thomas Financial
Those investors who believed they had constructed a “conservative” portfolio by being heavily invested in bonds could be reclassified as “aggressive.” Some also believe the move may be an attempt by the firm to lessen its liability in the event clients who are holding large positions in bonds decide to take legal action against UBS.
Mike Ryan, the chief investment strategist for UBS, said so-called “non consent” letters will be sent out to investors in the coming weeks alerting them of their changed classification – but he says it has little to do with a firm-wide bias against bonds. Rather, UBS is changing “its long-term view” reflecting what it views as a “volatile market…not just in fixed income.”
The Federal Reserve at some point will have to raise short-term interest rates (currently close to 0%), and end its quantitative easing program, which involves the Fed’s purchase of government bonds, which helps depress long-term interest rates and prop up bond prices (yields move in the opposite direction from price). Once this process starts, “conservative” investors with long bond positions will suffer devastating losses or be forced to hold to maturities of which can be decades down the road.
Bonds also carry credit risk and can default if the underlying company can no longer satisfy its obligations. Bonds are not without risk, however in many instances Bonds are presented as the safe alternative.
If you find yourself in this position, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your financial losses: 888-760-6552.
brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · conservative investors labeled aggressive at UBS · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide · risky investments · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · UBS · UBS bond loss lawyer · UBS changiing classification · UBS investments loss · UBS loss lawyer · UBS losses · UBS reclassifying bonds · UBS reclassifying investors · UBS Securities
31
FINRA Wants to Change Public Arbitrator Qualifications
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., also known as FINRA, is proposing to tighten its definition of “public” arbitrator. FINRA would like to exclude people associated with a mutual fund or hedge fund from its pool of public arbitrators and require others to wait for two years after ending an industry affiliation before being classified as a public arbitrator, writes Dan Jamieson in an article from the InvestmentNews.com.
On the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website, Finra said the change “would improve investors’ perception about the fairness and neutrality of Finra’s public arbitrator roster.”
FINRA is proposing a two-year cooling-off period for attorneys, accountants and others who have done a certain amount of work for securities industry clients, and for those who work for or serve as officers or directors of entities controlled by securities firms. This two-year wait would cover spouses and immediate family members of such individuals as well.
“In one instance, an individual applying to be a public arbitrator had retired one month earlier from a lengthy career at a law firm that represented securities industry clients,” FINRA said in its filing.
FINRA already has a five-year waiting period for former securities industry employees wishing to serve as public arbitrators, and bans those associated with the industry for at least 20 years from ever becoming public arbitrators.
Many feel Finra needs to go further and eliminate anyone who has had any connection with the industry as an arbitrator.
Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you or a loved one have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
5 year waiting period for FINRA arbitrator · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA arbitrators · FINRA arbitrators affiliation with securities industry · finra lawyer · FINRA Public Arbitrator Qualifications · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · Lars K. Soreide · securities fraud lawyer · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · Stock fraud lawyer
30
Reverse Convertibles Investors Linked to Apple Common Stock–Got Burned
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
Reverse convertibles, are often called “trigger notes,” “phoenixes,” or “auto-callables.” These structured products promised high yields of 6% to 12% or more, but trigger a conversion to Apple common stock if the price falls, usually on average 15% to 20%. With Apple down more than 25% from its high of last fall in 2012, many of these instruments may already converted and have handed their investors severe losses.
The price of Apple has dropped from over $700 to below $500 per share. Brokers sold a lot of structured notes based on the price when Apple was north of $700.
Many brokers represented to their clients that the structured notes were “safe and guaranteed,” and presented it as a way to benefit from the Apple’s rise without the risk. Unfortunately, the price of Apple plummeted, the notes converted and many conservative investors looking for a safe yield ended up with a lot of falling shares of Apple’s common stock.
$241 million of structured notes tied to Apple Inc. face losses after a 27 percent drop in the stock of the world’s most valuable company eroded built-in cushions that protect investors. Banks issued 76 US notes linked to Apple stock during the seven weeks starting August 20th. when the company was valued at $650 a share or more. In total, banks issued $1.66 billion of such notes, making Apple the most popular underlying company in such high commission structured products.
If you were a conservative investor who was seeking yield and ended up with a bunch of falling Apple common stock after buying Apple-linked reverse convertibles in 2012, Soreide Law Group would like to speak with you about your potential claim. Call 888-760-6552 or visit http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
auto-callables · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · high commission structured products · high risk investments · high yield structured products · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · phoenixes · reverse convertible notes · reverse convertibles linked to Apple Common Stock · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · structured products · trigger conversion to Apple · trigger notes
Soreide Law Group is currently investigation the UBS Willow Fund. This distressed debt hedge fund was formed in 2000. In October, 2012, its investors were informed that the fund would be liquidated after having sustained substantial losses. Willow Fund’s net asset value declined over $300 million.
In December, 2012, a class action lawsuit was filed against the UBS Willow Fund. The class action lawsuit may result in a recovery of some losses for UBS Willow Fund investors, however, we are investigating the liability that the brokerage firms and financial advisors potentially have for selling the UBS Willow Fund.
Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, who represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you invested in the UBS Willow Fund, call for a free consultation with an attorney on how to potentially recover your losses, at 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · distressed debt hedge fund · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · hedge fund losses · hedge funds · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock loss · UBS Willow Fund LLC · UBS Willow Fund Loss · UBS Willow Fund loss Lawyer · UBS Willow Fund losses
The following information is from FINRA’s website under “Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions, January, 2013.”
William Earl Manley (CRD #1177744, Registered Representative, Sarasota, Florida)
was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the findings, Manley consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he failed to respond to a FINRA request for information regarding his arrest, felony charge and termination from his member firm. The findings stated that Manley advised FINRA he would not respond to a request for information.
(FINRA Case #2012031461701)
This ends the information from FINRA’s website.
If you feel you may have a claim against William Earl Manley, contact
Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, who represents clients nationwide before FINRA. For a free consultation with an attorney on how to potentially recover your losses, call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
Broker failure to respond to FINRA requsest for information · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · failure to respond to FINRA · failure to respond to FINRA on felony arrest · failure to respond to FINRA on termination from firm · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars Soreide · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · Stock fraud lawyer · stockbroker misconduct · supervisory failures · William Earl Manley Sarasota FL · William Manley barred by FINRA · William Manley FINRA
13
Did You Invest With Beverly Hills Broker Bambi Holzer?
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
Soeide Law Group is currently investigating broker, Bambi I. Holzer, CRD #1088028. Ms. Holzer is currently a registered representative with Newport Coast Securities of Beverly Hills, CA. There have allegedly been numerous (over 50) reports filed against her in her 25+ year career, and over $11 million in awards and settlements. Several of these complaints have been regarding the improper sale of private placements, and the sale of variable annuities, another high-risk product that is now under heavy scrutiny from federal regulators.
She was previously employed by these Beverly Hills, CA, brokerages: Wedbush Morgan Securities, Sequoia Equities Securities Corp., and Brookstreet Securities Corp.
If you feel you may have a claim against Bambi Holzer call 888-760-6552.
Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you or a loved one have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. Visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
Bambi Holzer · Bambi Holzer Newport Coast Securities · Bambi I Holzer Beverly Hills CA · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · Brookstreet Securities Corp. · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA brokercheck · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · high-risk private placements · Lars Soreide · life insurance lawyer · Newport Coast Securities · private placement loss lawyer · private placements · securities arbitraton lawyer · Sequoia Equities Securities Corp · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock loss · variable annuities · variable annuity loss lawyer · wedbush morgan securities inc
10
FINRA Fines Total Over $68 Million in 2012
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority levied a total of $68 million in civil fines during 2012, according to statistics released by FINRA on Tuesday, January 8, 2013. This was slightly less than $71.9 million imposed by FINRA in 2011. The high-profile cases against large brokerages accounted for about one-third of total fines in 2012.
It was also noted that FINRA ordered brokerages to repay harmed investors a record $34 million.
FINRA oversees about 4,290 brokerages and 630,000 brokers.
Many of FINRA’s cases against Wall Street’s largest brokerages in 2012, including Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, UBS, AG, and Wells Fargo Corp. These cases stem from FINRA’s increased interest in potential conflicts of interest and complex products, such as certain types of exchange-traded funds, said Richard Ketchum, FINRA’s chairman and chief executive, in an interview with Reuters.
These priorities “will result in more cases against large firms because they’re the ones engineering those products and the ones that have many of the conflicts because of their complexity,” Ketchum said. For example, brokerage units that underwrite offerings of certain risky products stand to profit when retail brokers in the same firm boost sales of those products by pushing them to investors, even though they may not be suitable.
Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you or a loved one have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. Visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
broker conflicts of interest · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · complex product losses · complex products sold to investors · exchange traded fund · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA fines in 2012 · FINRA fines up · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · hidden costs in complex investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide · risky investments · Stock fraud lawyer · supervisory failures · unsuitable investment recommendations · unsuitable investments
