Finra warned investors that if the interest rates rise – as most pros expect – bond investors could be slammed by long duration, writes Dan Jamieson in a Feb. 14th., 2013 article for InvestmentNews.com

FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. in an investor alert, told investors that in the event of rising interest rates, “outstanding bonds, particularly those with a low interest rate and high duration may experience significant price drops.”

FINRA gave the example of a bond fund with 10-year duration will decrease in value by 10% if rates rise one percentage point, the alert warns.

FINRA added that bond-fund investors can find measures of duration in a bond fund’s fact sheet, and individual bond investors can check with their investment professionals, the bond’s issuer, or they can use an online calculator to get the figure.

Short duration doesn’t mean risk-free, the alert says.

“Bonds and bond funds are subject to inflation risk, call risk, default risk and other risk factors,” the warning says.

Bonds are not without risk, however in many instances bonds are presented as the safe alternative.

If you find yourself in this position, call Soreide Law Group for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your financial losses: 888-760-6552.

bonds price drop · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · call risk in bonds · default risk in bonds · Duration of bonds rates rising · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · FINRA warning on bonds · FINRA warns Bond Investors · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · inflation risk in bonds · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · low interest rate bonds with high duration · misrepresentation of bonds by brokers · risk in bond · risky bonds · risky investments · Unsuitable investments to elderly

Financial regulators are confronting investor frauds that are giving retirement savers steep losses on complex products that until a few years ago were aimed only at the most sophisticated investors, writes Nathaniel Popper in a New York Times article from Feb. 11, 2013.

These victims are among the millions of Americans whose mutual funds and stock portfolios fell in the financial crisis, and who started searching for ways to make better returns. Many investors put money into speculative bets promoted by aggressive financial advisers. These investments included private loans to young companies and shares in bundles of commercial real estate properties.

“Since the crisis, we’ve seen more and more people reaching out into different types of exotic investments that are a big concern to us,” said William F. Galvin, the Massachusetts secretary of the commonwealth.

Wednesday, Feb. 6th., 2013, Mr. Galvin’s office ordered one of the nation’s largest brokerage firms, LPL Financial, to pay $2.5 million for improperly selling the real estate bundles, known as nontraded REITs, or real estate investment trusts, to hundreds of Massachusetts residents from 2006 to 2009, in some cases overloading clients’ accounts with them.

J. Bradley Bennett, chief of enforcement at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, said that for the last two years, 10 staff members have looked at the “proliferation of these products, to understand how they are being sold.”

“It’s got our attention,” he said. “We recognize the trends.”

Brokers are eager to sell these investments because they often bring in higher commissions. Several of these products hold out the promise of higher returns. Many of the investors in these complex products have filed claims with FINRA.

Private placements have been on the list of top enforcement concerns published by the national organization of state securities regulators every year since 2007. The private placements are supposed to be available only to wealthy, sophisticated investors, but several loopholes have allowed them to end up in the portfolios of less sophisticated retirement savers.

REITs have been one of the most heavily sold products. The new version, nontraded — the type that got LPL Financial in trouble in Massachusetts — can be bought and sold only in private transactions.

The outstanding amount of such nontraded REITs grew to $65 billion last year, from $43 billion in 2009. FINRA also issued a $14 million fine in October against David Lerner Associates, a large purveyor of nontraded REITs in the New York area.

If you or a family member have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations regarding non-traded REITs, private placements, or other complex products, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website and complete our online form at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · brokers selling complex products · complex products sold by brokers · Complex REITs · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · high risk investments · high-risk private placements · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars Soreide · LPL Financial LLC · LPL nontraded REITs · LPL sued by Massachusetts · Non traded REIT loss · non-traded real estate investment trusts · Nontraded REIT loss lawyer · Nontraded REITs · private placements · REITs · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · Unsuitable investments to elderly

Crystallex has commenced a proceeding under chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware in order to ensure that relevant CCAA orders are enforced in the United States. Many stock brokers recommended CRYXF to their clients as an undervalued mining company that is poised for a big jump. This investment may not have been suitable for conservative investors. If your stock broker recommended a significant investment into Crystallex recently you may be able to recover some or all of your investment losses.

On December 23, 2011, Crystallex received an initial order from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granting CCAA protection until January 21, 2012. Proceedings by creditors cannot be continued or commenced without the consent of the Company and Ernst & Young Inc. (the Monitor) or leave of the Court. The Court extended the stay until March 23, 2012. The Court approved the terms of an interim bridge loan for Crystallex in the amount of US$3.125 million. The bridge loan is a secured, short term loan, due the earlier of April 16, 2012 or the first draw on a debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) financing facility, and is intended to provide the Company with working capital while it continues to pursue DIP financing and progress its arbitration claim.

Crystallex International Corporation is a Canadian based mining company, with a focus on acquiring, exploring, developing and operating mining projects. Crystallex has operated an open pit mine in Uruguay and developed and operated three gold mines in Venezuela.

Call (888) 760-6552 if your stock broker recommended you purchase Crystallex CRYXF.

broker recommending risky investments · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · Crystallex gold mines · Crystallex International Corporation · Crystallex loss lawyer · Crystallex losses · CRYXF · CRYXF Canadian mining company · CRYXF loss lawyer · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · gold mining stock · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide · mining project stock loss · mining stock · mining stock loss lawyer · risky investments · securities fraud lawyer · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · undervalued mining stock

In a FINRA NTM 13-07 posted last Thursday on its website, FINRA asked for comment on an updated proposal that would keep the 5% guideline in place.

The action follows complaints about an earlier proposal to eliminate the 5% rule for markups and markdowns.

In other words, any FINRA broker/dealer can make up to 5% commission on the front and back end of every trade. This “commission” is hidden on the order ticket called a mark up. Many investors look at the transaction fee which is a usually a low flat consistent fee that they see on every ticket. A mark up is when firms add a cost to the price per share that is their profit. Look for it at the bottom of the order ticket in fine print where it will tell you the per share mark up and multiply by the number of shares you bought and suddenly the $25 you thought you were paying per trade just shot up to over $1,000.00. Yes, the industry is in it to make money for themselves, not for you.

“A majority of the comments received on the initial proposal opposed the elimination of the 5% policy,” FINRA said in the notice. “These commenters stated that the 5% policy generally has been effective in regulating broker-dealers for over 70 years and eliminating it would reduce investor protection.” It is only logical that the industry will oppose what keeps them rich and the investors poor.

In its initial proposal — floated nearly two years ago — FINRA had promised updated guidance to replace the 5% threshold, but commenters warned against eliminating it without setting a new standard.

Nevertheless, industry attorneys don’t like the old 5% limit, which dates from 1943.

It’s really is sending a bad message to member firms that a 5% markup or markdown is generally OK.

FINRA examiners actually use something closer to a 2% to 3% markup, observers say, and FINRA has consistently said the 5% rule is a guideline only.

“It’s like charades; you don’t know what they’re looking for,” Ms. Baird said.

If you have been charged excessive mark ups or mark downs call a securities lawyer at (888) 760-6552 or visit http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

5% broker dealer markup rule · 5% commission by brokers · 5% markup and markdown FINRA · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · complaints about stock markups · eliminate 5% policy with brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA end 5% markup rule · finra lawyer · FINRA NTM 13-07 · finra securities arbitration lawyer · FINRA update 5% threshold · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · investor check tickets for markup · Lars Soreide · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC

Those investors who believed they had constructed a “conservative” portfolio by being heavily invested in bonds could be reclassified as “aggressive.” Some also believe the move may be an attempt by the firm to lessen its liability in the event clients who are holding large positions in bonds decide to take legal action against UBS.

Mike Ryan, the chief investment strategist for UBS, said so-called “non consent” letters will be sent out to investors in the coming weeks alerting them of their changed classification – but he says it has little to do with a firm-wide bias against bonds. Rather, UBS is changing “its long-term view” reflecting what it views as a “volatile market…not just in fixed income.”

The Federal Reserve at some point will have to raise short-term interest rates (currently close to 0%), and end its quantitative easing program, which involves the Fed’s purchase of government bonds, which helps depress long-term interest rates and prop up bond prices (yields move in the opposite direction from price). Once this process starts, “conservative” investors with long bond positions will suffer devastating losses or be forced to hold to maturities of which can be decades down the road.

Bonds also carry credit risk and can default if the underlying company can no longer satisfy its obligations. Bonds are not without risk, however in many instances Bonds are presented as the safe alternative.

If you find yourself in this position, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your financial losses: 888-760-6552.

brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · conservative investors labeled aggressive at UBS · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide · risky investments · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · UBS · UBS bond loss lawyer · UBS changiing classification · UBS investments loss · UBS loss lawyer · UBS losses · UBS reclassifying bonds · UBS reclassifying investors · UBS Securities

The following information is from FINRA’s website under “Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions, January, 2013.”

Alison Marie Janke (CRD #4409155, Registered Representative, Port Richey, Florida)

was fined $11,600, which includes the disgorgement of financial benefit received of $6,600, and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for three months.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Alison Janke consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings that she had participated in a private securities transaction without providing prior written notice to her member firm.

Ms.Janke referred a customer who was seeking alternative investments to a registered representative at a different firm, where the customer invested $200,000 in a real estate investment trust (REIT) through the other registered representative. Alison Janke not only referred the customer to another representative, but also attended the meeting with the customer and the other representative, and assisted with the completion of the purchase transaction.

The findings stated that a limited liability company Janke owned received a $6,600 payment in connection with the sale of the REIT.

The suspension is in effect from December 3, 2012, through March 2, 2013.
(FINRA Case #2011030660801)
This ends the information from FINRA’s website.

Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, has represented clients nationwide. If you find yourself in this situation, or a similar situation with your broker or financial advisor, call for a free consultation with an attorney, 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

Alison Janke FINRA fine and suspension · Alison Marie Janke Port Richey FL · broker referring customer to another firm · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · private securities transactions without written notification · Real Estate Investment Trust · REIT · REIT loss Lawyer · REIT recovery lawyer · stock loss · supervisory failures

The following information is from FINRA’s website under “Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions, January, 2013.”

Kenneth Andrew Mauchin (CRD #2366345, Registered Principal, Sanford, Florida)

was named a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he misappropriated $23,750 from elderly customers’ accounts by converting their funds to cashier’s checks and depositing those checks into a bank account of an entity he controlled.

FINRA’s complaint alleges that Mauchin did so without the customers’ knowledge or authorization. The complaint also alleges that Mauchin prepared a customer’s application for a variable annuity and falsely listed his bank branch office address as the customer’s mailing address, which he knew to be false.

Also, a customer applied for a premiere select IRA brokerage account with Mauchin’s firm and, without the customer’s knowledge or authorization, he falsely listed his bank branch office address as the customer’s mailing address, which he knew to be false. These applications became part of the firm’s books and records, causing his firm’s books and records to be false.

This complaint further alleges that Mauchin failed to appear for FINRA testimony.
(FINRA Case #2011028452701)

This ends the information from FINRA’s website.

Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you or a loved one have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

broker failing to receive approval from customers · broker failure to respond to FINRA's requests · broker listing false information · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · elder abuse · elder abuse awareness · elder abuse in investments · failure to respond to FINRA requests · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Kenneth Andrew Mauchin Sanford Florida · Kenneth Mauchin FINRA charges · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · misappropriation of funds by broker · misappropriation of funds by broker on elderly · securities arbitraton lawyer · supervisory failures · targeting elderly investors · Unsuitable investments to elderly

The following information is from FINRA’s website under “Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions, January, 2013.”

David Scott Isolano (CRD #2504880, Registered Principal, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania)

was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the findings, Isolano consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he failed to respond to a FINRA request to appear for on-the-record testimony concerning an investigation into fixed income transactions executed with excessive markups.

(FINRA Case #2009019803302)

This ends the information from FINRA’s website.

Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you or a loved one have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

Broker David Isolano barred by FINRA · broker failed to respond to FINRA · Broker failure to respond to FINRA requsest for information · broker not appearing before FINRA · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · David Isolano barred by FINRA · David Scott Isolano Barred by FINRA · David Scott Isolano Harrisburg PA · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · fixed income investments · fixed income transactions with excessive markups · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · securities fraud lawyer · securities lawyer · stock loss · supervisory failures

Soreide Law Group, PLLC, is conducting an investigation into Behringer Harvard REIT I.

Earlier this year, Behringer Harvard REIT I lost two properties in Minnesota and St. Louis to foreclosure. At midyear, the company listed $3.98 billion in assets and $2.509 billion in liabilities.

There are now lawsuits stating that share values in the REIT have fallen from about $10 in the original offering to currently as little as $2.40 in the secondary market. Some of the claims in the lawsuit allege that the Behringer Harvard REIT’s officers misrepresented its financial results and prospects. Other claims in the suit state that officers charged excessive fees and “compensated themselves handsomely out of the proceeds they have raised from the offerings.”

If your stock broker or financial advisor sold you Behringer Harvard Strategic Opportunity Fund I, and you sustained a significant loss of your investment, call Securities Lawyer, Lars Soreide, at 888-760-6552 for a free consultation, or visit Soreide Law Group’s website at: http://securitieslawyer.com.

Behringer Harvard · Behringer Harvard lawsuit · Behringer Harvard lawyer · Behringer Harvard REIT I · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · excessive fees by brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · high risk investments · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · misrepresentation of fiancial prospectus by stockbrokers · misrepresentation of stock value · REIT · REIT loss Lawyer · REIT losses · stock broker fraud · stock loss

The following are statistics compiled by FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, posted recently to their website. The statistics show that investor complaints are down while disciplinary action is at a 5 year high.

Investor Complaints Received by FINRA

In 2007 there were 4,552 complaints received by FINRA.
However, in 2011 there were 2,979 down over 1500 in just four years.

New Disciplinary Actions Filed at FINRA

In 2007 there were 1,177 disciplinary actions filed and in 2011, 1,488, up by over 300.

Formal Actions Resolved

In 2007 there were 1,107 formal actions resolved and in 2011, 1,287, up over 100.

Individuals Suspended

In 2007, there were 288 individuals suspended by FINRA. In 2011, there were 475 up by almost 200.

Securities Lawyer, Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you or a loved one have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses through a FINRA arbitration. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA brokercheck · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud lawyer · securities lawyer · Stock fraud lawyer · supervisory failures