Finra warned investors that if the interest rates rise – as most pros expect – bond investors could be slammed by long duration, writes Dan Jamieson in a Feb. 14th., 2013 article for InvestmentNews.com

FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. in an investor alert, told investors that in the event of rising interest rates, “outstanding bonds, particularly those with a low interest rate and high duration may experience significant price drops.”

FINRA gave the example of a bond fund with 10-year duration will decrease in value by 10% if rates rise one percentage point, the alert warns.

FINRA added that bond-fund investors can find measures of duration in a bond fund’s fact sheet, and individual bond investors can check with their investment professionals, the bond’s issuer, or they can use an online calculator to get the figure.

Short duration doesn’t mean risk-free, the alert says.

“Bonds and bond funds are subject to inflation risk, call risk, default risk and other risk factors,” the warning says.

Bonds are not without risk, however in many instances bonds are presented as the safe alternative.

If you find yourself in this position, call Soreide Law Group for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your financial losses: 888-760-6552.

bonds price drop · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · call risk in bonds · default risk in bonds · Duration of bonds rates rising · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · FINRA warning on bonds · FINRA warns Bond Investors · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · inflation risk in bonds · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · low interest rate bonds with high duration · misrepresentation of bonds by brokers · risk in bond · risky bonds · risky investments · Unsuitable investments to elderly

Nicholas Rowe and his firm, Focus Capital Wealth Management, Inc. of Bedford, New Hampshire, were found liable in a case alleging negligence, civil fraud, and other misdeeds, involving the sale of risky ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) to nine investors, according to a ruling by a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel. Some of these investors were in their fifties and sixties, including two widows. Rowe was ordered to pay $1.8 million to the investors.

The Reuters article goes on to explain that leveraged and inverse ETFs were designed to amplify short-term returns by using debt and derivatives and are considered more suitable for professional traders than for long-term investors or anyone does not want a high-risk portfolio. In 2009, FINRA and other regulators began issuing warnings about the sale of leveraged and inverse ETFs because they worried that brokers were selling them to buy-and-hold investors – a strategy likely to cause heavy losses.

The Reuters article says that FINRA arbitration may be the last hope for some investors whose advisers guided them to leveraged and inverse ETFs and then mismanaged the investments.

Investors in the Rowe case were all heavily concentrated in leveraged and inverse ETFs. That strategy is nearly guaranteed to lead to losses, since the investments effectively require betting on whether the market is going up or down.

Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, represents clients nationwide. If you invested with Nicholas Rowe or Focus Capital Wealth Management, Inc., or had losses in other leveraged and inverse ETFs, call: 888-760-6552, or you may visit our website and complete the online form at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · elder abuse in investments · exchange traded fund · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra securities arbitration · Focus Capital Wealth Mangement Inc · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · inverse ETFs · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · Leveraged ETFs · leveraged inverse ETF's · Nicholas Rowe · Nicholas Rowe Bedford New Hampshire · Nicholas Rowe fined by FINRA for ETF · Unsuitable investments to elderly

Last week LPL Financial Holdings agreed to pay $2.5 million in fines and restitution for improperly supervising brokers who sold non-traded real estate investment trusts. (Please note that LPL neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing.) These non-traded REITs are high-yielding and very popular. These non-traded REITs have jumped about 50% since 2009, to $65 billion. They are difficult to track and value, since they don’t trade on public exchanges.
Below is a list of REITs, some of which LPL Financial Holdings were fined for allegedly selling with improper supervision to clients who were not interested in taking the risks with their conservative portfolios.

American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value, Inc.
American Realty Capital Global Trust, Inc.
ARC Retail Centers of America
American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc.
ARC Healthcare Trust
American Realty Capital Phillips Edison
Shopping Center REIT
American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. Update
American Realty Capital New York Recovery REIT
ARC Property Trust, Inc.
Arciterra National REIT, LP
Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT II, Inc.
Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc.
Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT
Clearwater Opportunity REIT
CNL Global Growth Trust, Inc.
CNL Global Income Trust, Inc.
Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc.
Hines Global REIT, Inc. 2012
Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.
Inland Diversified REIT
Lightstone Value Plus REIT II Update
NetREIT Dubose Model Home REIT, Inc.
NetREIT $200,000,000 Stock Offering Update
O’Donnell Strategic Industrial REIT, Inc.
Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc.
RREEF Property Trust, Inc.
UCM US RMBS Opportunity REIT, Inc.
US Apartment Investors 2010, Inc.
Wells Core Office Income REIT

If you purchased these or other REITs, and sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call Soreide Law Group, PLLC, for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website and complete our online form at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · clients with low risk portfolios · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · high risk investments · high-risk private placements · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · LPL · LPL Financial LLC · LPL fined over REIT sales · LPL REIT investors · LPL sale to elderly · LPL sued by Massachusetts · non-traded real estate investment trusts · Non-traded REIT loss lawyer · nontraded REIT loss · Nontraded REITs · Real Estate Investment Trust · securities lawyer · Unsuitable investments to elderly

In an article, Feb. 7, 2013, in the New York Post, it was reported that (broker-dealer owner), Anastasios “Tommy” Belesis’ firm, John Thomas Financial, is being investigated by the FBI, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. (FINRA).

Mr. Belesis has made many media appearances on cable business/financial shows.

According to FINRA’s BrokerCheck, S.W. Bach & Co. fired him in 2005 for “inaccurate representation of identity to customer.” In 2001, a client sued him and a firm for $750,000 for churning and a FINRA arbitration panel later awarded the client $259,000. Mr. Belesis and firms he’s worked for have settled two other FINRA arbitration claims for nearly $100,000. Belesis paid $46,000 as his share of the settlements.

John Thomas’ FINRA record shows failures to disclose fees to clients about transaction charges. Arkansas Securities Department fined John Thomas $25,000 last year for allegedly not disclosing to clients handling fees for stock orders. The Connecticut Banking Department fined the firm $20,000 over similar failures on fee disclosures, and FINRA fined it $275,000 for “postage and handling” violations.

If you have been a client of Anastasios “Tommy” Belesis, and/or his firm, John Thomas Financial, and experienced financial losses call a securities lawyer at (888) 760-6552 or visit http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

Anastasios Belesis · broker churning accounts · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · failure to disclose fees by broker to client · failure to supervise brokers · fee disclosures by bokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA brokercheck · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · investigation into John Thomas Financial · John Thomas Financial investigation · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities lawyer · Stock fraud lawyer · Tommy Belesis · Tommy Belesis John Thomas Financial

On Feb. 6th., 2013, LPL Financial, LLC, was ordered by Massachusetts Security Division to pay restitution of more than $2 million to investors who bought shares of nontraded real estate investment trusts (REITs) and a $500,000 administrative fine, which involved investors who bought shares of several different nontraded REITs in violation of state limitations, and the company’s own rules and procedures. LPL also has agreed to review all nontraded REITs sold in Massachusetts and offered to make restitution to all other investors who bought the securities in violation of state limits or company rules.

LPL Financial and Ameriprise Financial Inc. are the two biggest sellers of nontraded REITs, accounting for almost 20% of the industry’s annual sales of $10 billion. Regulators recently have put the nontraded REITs on close watch as a number of the largest REITs have suffered sharp devaluations.

In its consent order with Massachusetts regulators, LPL admitted to a series of statements of fact around the sales of the REITs but neither admitted nor denied allegations stemming from the training and oversight of sales of nontraded REITs as well as alleged violations of securities laws. The REIT sales occurred between 2006 and 2009.

Below is a list of non-traded REITs sold by many broker/dealers:

American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value, Inc.
American Realty Capital Global Trust, Inc.
ARC Retail Centers of America
American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc.
ARC Healthcare Trust
American Realty Capital Phillips Edison
Shopping Center REIT
American Realty Capital Trust, Inc.
American Realty Capital New York Recovery REIT
ARC Property Trust, Inc.
Arciterra National REIT, LP
Behringer Harvard Multifamily REIT II, Inc.
Bluerock Enhanced Multifamily Trust, Inc.
Carter Validus Mission Critical REIT
Clearwater Opportunity REIT
CNL Global Growth Trust, Inc.
CNL Global Income Trust, Inc.
Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc. 2nd Offering
Hines Global REIT, Inc. 2012 Update
Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.
Inland Diversified REIT
Lightstone Value Plus REIT II
NetREIT Dubose Model Home REIT, Inc.
NetREIT $200,000,000 Stock Offering Update
O’Donnell Strategic Industrial REIT, Inc.
Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc.
RREEF Property Trust, Inc.
UCM US RMBS Opportunity REIT, Inc.
US Apartment Investors 2010, Inc.
Wells Core Office Income REIT

Securities Attorney, Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, has represented clients nationwide. If you or a family member have experienced losses through LPL Financial, LLC, or any other nontraded REIT, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

Ameriprise Financial Inc · broker violating company policy on REITs · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra securities arbitration lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · LPL Financial LLC · LPL fined over REIT sales · LPL nontraded REITs · non-traded real estate investment trusts · Non-traded REIT loss lawyer · nontraded REIT loss · Nontraded REITs · securities lawyer

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today, January 29th., 2013, on it’s website announced that it has charged a former managing director of Jefferies & Co., Inc. (Jefferies), a New York-based broker-dealer, with making misrepresentations and engaging in misleading conduct while he sold mortgage-backed securities (MBS) in the wake of the financial crisis.

The SEC alleges that Jesse Litvak, a senior trader on Jefferies’ MBS Desk who worked at Jefferies’ office in Stamford, Connecticut, where he bought and sold MBS from and to his customers. From 2009 to 2011, Litvak allegedly lied to, or otherwise misled, those customers about the prices that Jefferies had purchased the MBS before selling it to another customer and the amount of his firm’s compensation for arranging the trades. Litvak also misled his customer into believing that he was arranging a MBS trade between customers, when Litvak really was selling the MBS out of Jefferies’ inventory. Litvak also misled customers about how much money they were paying in compensation to Jefferies. These customers included investment funds established by the United States government in the wake of the financial crisis to help support the market for MBS as well as other investment funds, including hedge funds.

It was also noted in the article on the SEC website that according to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, Litvak engaged in misconduct on over 25 trades. When Litvak offered his customers MBS, he lied to them about how much Jefferies had paid (or was paying) for the securities. On some occasions, Litvak also pretended to be actively negotiating with an outside party to buy a security that he would then re-sell to his customer. But none of these negotiations were taking place; instead, Litvak fabricated the existence of the seller and every detail about active negotiations with it. In fact, as Litvak knew, Jefferies had purchased these bonds days before and already held them in its inventory.

The SEC’s complaint charges Litvak with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The complaint seeks a final judgment permanently enjoining Litvak from future violations of the federal securities laws, ordering him to disgorge his ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and order him to pay civil penalties.

Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you or a loved one have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

broker arranging trades selling MBS inventory · broker theft from customers · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · fabricating existence of seller by broker · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · investment fraud · Jefferies · Jefferies & Co Inc · Jefferies Stamford CT · Jesse Litvak · Jesse Litvak MBS · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · MBS · misappropriation · mortgage backed securities · risky investments · supervisory failures

The following information is from FINRA’s website under “Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions, January, 2013.”

Alison Marie Janke (CRD #4409155, Registered Representative, Port Richey, Florida)

was fined $11,600, which includes the disgorgement of financial benefit received of $6,600, and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for three months.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Alison Janke consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings that she had participated in a private securities transaction without providing prior written notice to her member firm.

Ms.Janke referred a customer who was seeking alternative investments to a registered representative at a different firm, where the customer invested $200,000 in a real estate investment trust (REIT) through the other registered representative. Alison Janke not only referred the customer to another representative, but also attended the meeting with the customer and the other representative, and assisted with the completion of the purchase transaction.

The findings stated that a limited liability company Janke owned received a $6,600 payment in connection with the sale of the REIT.

The suspension is in effect from December 3, 2012, through March 2, 2013.
(FINRA Case #2011030660801)
This ends the information from FINRA’s website.

Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, has represented clients nationwide. If you find yourself in this situation, or a similar situation with your broker or financial advisor, call for a free consultation with an attorney, 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

Alison Janke FINRA fine and suspension · Alison Marie Janke Port Richey FL · broker referring customer to another firm · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · private securities transactions without written notification · Real Estate Investment Trust · REIT · REIT loss Lawyer · REIT recovery lawyer · stock loss · supervisory failures

The following information is from FINRA’s website under “Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions, January, 2013.”

Kenneth Andrew Mauchin (CRD #2366345, Registered Principal, Sanford, Florida)

was named a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he misappropriated $23,750 from elderly customers’ accounts by converting their funds to cashier’s checks and depositing those checks into a bank account of an entity he controlled.

FINRA’s complaint alleges that Mauchin did so without the customers’ knowledge or authorization. The complaint also alleges that Mauchin prepared a customer’s application for a variable annuity and falsely listed his bank branch office address as the customer’s mailing address, which he knew to be false.

Also, a customer applied for a premiere select IRA brokerage account with Mauchin’s firm and, without the customer’s knowledge or authorization, he falsely listed his bank branch office address as the customer’s mailing address, which he knew to be false. These applications became part of the firm’s books and records, causing his firm’s books and records to be false.

This complaint further alleges that Mauchin failed to appear for FINRA testimony.
(FINRA Case #2011028452701)

This ends the information from FINRA’s website.

Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you or a loved one have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

broker failing to receive approval from customers · broker failure to respond to FINRA's requests · broker listing false information · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · elder abuse · elder abuse awareness · elder abuse in investments · failure to respond to FINRA requests · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Kenneth Andrew Mauchin Sanford Florida · Kenneth Mauchin FINRA charges · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · misappropriation of funds by broker · misappropriation of funds by broker on elderly · securities arbitraton lawyer · supervisory failures · targeting elderly investors · Unsuitable investments to elderly

The following information is from FINRA’s website under “Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions, January, 2013.”

David Scott Isolano (CRD #2504880, Registered Principal, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania)

was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the findings, Isolano consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he failed to respond to a FINRA request to appear for on-the-record testimony concerning an investigation into fixed income transactions executed with excessive markups.

(FINRA Case #2009019803302)

This ends the information from FINRA’s website.

Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, represents clients nationwide before FINRA. If you or a loved one have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.

Broker David Isolano barred by FINRA · broker failed to respond to FINRA · Broker failure to respond to FINRA requsest for information · broker not appearing before FINRA · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · David Isolano barred by FINRA · David Scott Isolano Barred by FINRA · David Scott Isolano Harrisburg PA · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · fixed income investments · fixed income transactions with excessive markups · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · securities fraud lawyer · securities lawyer · stock loss · supervisory failures

Massachusetts securities regulators sued LPL Financial, LLC, in December over sales practices of brokers regarding the REITs. Secretary of the Commonwealth, William Galvin, charged LPL Financial with a failure to supervise registered reps who sold the nontraded REITs in violation of both state limitations and the company’s rules. The Securities Division also charged LPL Financial with dishonest and unethical business practices writes Bruce Kelly in an article in InvestmentNews.com.

These charges stem from the sales of $28 million of nontraded REITs to almost 600 clients from 2006 to 2009. The Securities Division found that 569 had regulatory violations. These included sales made in violation of Massachusetts 10% concentration limits; sales made in violation of prospectus requirement; and sales made in violation of LPL compliance practices. LPL received gross commission of $1.8 million for those sales, according to the complaint.

The InvestmentNews.com article goes on to say that the largest amount of sales was for Inland American Real Estate Trust Inc., the largest nontraded REIT in the industry, with $11.2 billion in real estate assets. Massachusetts investors put at least $20.1 million in Inland American, which is currently the focus of a fact-finding investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Massachusetts is seeking full restitution to clients in the state who were sold REITs allegedly in violation of state and prospectus requirements. It is also seeking an unspecified administrative fine against the firm.

LPL Financial is the largest independent broker-dealer, with more than 13,000 registered reps and advisers. Along with Ameriprise Financial Inc., it is one of the largest sellers of nontraded REITs, which are sold only through independent broker-dealers. The investments are marketed as a way to diversify an investor’s portfolio and generate income.

Nontraded REITs, which had over $10 billion in sales in 2012, have drawn attention from regulators and the market recently. Many notable REITs took hits in 2008 and 2009 during the broad downturn of the commercial real estate market. Some of the industry’s largest REITs have suffered a drop in valuations of 25% to 50%, and some REITs have also cut dividends to investors.

Securities Attorney, Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, has represented clients nationwide. If you or a family member have experienced losses through LPL Financial, LLC, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Ameriprise Financial Inc · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · failure to supervise brokers · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration lawyer · high risk investments · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · inland american real estate trust inc · Inland American REIT · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · LPL Financial LLC · LPL nontraded REITs · LPL sued by Massachusetts · LPL variable annuities · nontraded real estate investment trusts · Nontraded REIT loss lawyer · Nontraded REITs · REIT loss Lawyer · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · Stock fraud lawyer · variable annuities