TAG | Securities and Exchange Commission
8
FBI, SEC and FINRA Investigating Tommy Belesis’ Firm, John Thomas Financial
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
In an article, Feb. 7, 2013, in the New York Post, it was reported that (broker-dealer owner), Anastasios “Tommy” Belesis’ firm, John Thomas Financial, is being investigated by the FBI, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. (FINRA).
Mr. Belesis has made many media appearances on cable business/financial shows.
According to FINRA’s BrokerCheck, S.W. Bach & Co. fired him in 2005 for “inaccurate representation of identity to customer.” In 2001, a client sued him and a firm for $750,000 for churning and a FINRA arbitration panel later awarded the client $259,000. Mr. Belesis and firms he’s worked for have settled two other FINRA arbitration claims for nearly $100,000. Belesis paid $46,000 as his share of the settlements.
John Thomas’ FINRA record shows failures to disclose fees to clients about transaction charges. Arkansas Securities Department fined John Thomas $25,000 last year for allegedly not disclosing to clients handling fees for stock orders. The Connecticut Banking Department fined the firm $20,000 over similar failures on fee disclosures, and FINRA fined it $275,000 for “postage and handling” violations.
If you have been a client of Anastasios “Tommy” Belesis, and/or his firm, John Thomas Financial, and experienced financial losses call a securities lawyer at (888) 760-6552 or visit http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
Anastasios Belesis · broker churning accounts · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · failure to disclose fees by broker to client · failure to supervise brokers · fee disclosures by bokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA brokercheck · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · investigation into John Thomas Financial · John Thomas Financial investigation · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities lawyer · Stock fraud lawyer · Tommy Belesis · Tommy Belesis John Thomas Financial
29
FINRA’s BrokerCheck May Soon Be Linked to Firm Websites
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., also known as FINRA, is proposing a new rule that would allow investors to access information about a financial advisor’s business and disciplinary history directly from the firm’s web page.
FINRA filed a regulatory notice in the Jan. 25 edition of the Federal Register. FINRA said the rule would require its broker-dealer members to include “a prominent description of and link to BrokerCheck on their websites, social-media pages and any comparable Internet presence.”
BrokerCheck contains information on brokers, including professional background, the type of practice they run and whether they have been disciplined by FINRA or other regulators. Under the new proposal, a broker or firm’s website would have a direct link to the broker’s or firm’s specific BrokerCheck page. Investors would be able to click and go right to those pages.
“FINRA believes that the proposed rule change would increase investor awareness and use of BrokerCheck, thereby helping investors make informed choices about the individuals and firms with which they conduct business,” the Federal Register notice stated.
This proposal responds to a January, 2011 study by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), mandated by the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, that examined ways to increase investor access to BrokerCheck.
This proposal follows a recent FINRA proposal to make brokers disclose their compensation incentives when they move from one firm to another. This comes at a time when there is much confusion about how investment advisors and brokers can use websites, blogs and social media.
Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, who represents clients nationwide before FINRA. For a free consultation with an attorney on how to potentially recover your losses, call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
broker discipline · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokercheck improvements · BrokerCheck linked to firm website · brokers using social media · Federal Register artilce on BrokerCheck · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · Find Finra BrokerCheck · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA brokercheck · FINRA rule allowing access directly to BrokerCheck · FINRA's BrokerCheck · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · how to use BrokerCheck · Lars K. Soreide · Making all BrokerCheck public information · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC
13
$42 Million Ponzi-Like Scheme Shut Down by SEC
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it obtained an emergency court order to halt an alleged Ponzi-like scheme operated by Small Business Capital Corp. and its principal Mark Feathers, who raised $42 million by selling securities issued by Investors Prime Fund LLC and SBC Portfolio Fund LLC – two mortgage investment funds they controlled.
The SEC alleges that over 400 investors were promised that profits from mortgage investments would yield annual returns of 7.5 percent or more. When in fact, Feathers operated a Ponzi-like scheme by paying returns to investors that came partly from fund profits and partly from other investors.
“Feathers raised millions from investors by promising high returns,” said John McCoy, Associate Regional Director of the SEC’s Los Angeles Office. “The returns turned out to be too good to be true and were funded in part with new investors’ money.”
In the SEC article they allege that from 2009 to early 2012, Feathers improperly transferred more than $6 million from the funds to Small Business Capital to pay its expenses, including substantial payments to Feathers.
Additionally, the SEC alleges that investors were not told that in February and March 2012, the defendants caused one fund to sell mortgages to the other fund at an inflated price, thus generating a “profit” for the selling fund so it could pay Small Business Capital management fees of more than $575,000. The SEC charged Feathers and Small Business Capital for Small Business Capital’s effecting transactions in the funds’ securities without being registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC.
If your broker recommended you invest in this product, call and speak to an attorney at Soreide Law Group for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your investment losses. Call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
broker theft from customers · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · Feathers Small Business Capital · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · investment fraud · Investors Prime Fund LLC · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · Mark Feathers · misappropriation of funds by broker · mortgage investment funds · mortgage related investments · Ponzi scheme · ponzi schemes · SBC Portfolio Fund LLC · SEC · SEC shuts down Ponzi · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities fraud lawyer · Small Business Capital · Small Business Capital Corp · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · unregistered broker-dealer Mark Feathers
13
SEC Charges in Oil Drilling Scam by South Floridian Joseph Hilton/Yurkin
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently announced that it has obtained an emergency court order to freeze the assets of a South Florida man who has been charged with fraudulently offering investments in oil drilling projects in an article posted on the SEC’s website.
The SEC’s complaint, unsealed in federal court in West Palm Beach, Fla., alleges that Joseph Hilton made numerous misrepresentations to investors while selling limited partnership units in two oil drilling projects earlier this year through his firm Pacific Northwestern Energy LLC. Hilton falsely told potential investors that Pacific acquired its wells from Exxon Mobil Corp., and he overstated Pacific’s experience in the oil and gas industry and the historical accomplishments of its drillers. Hilton raised approximately $789,000 from investors. The SEC’s action froze the assets of Hilton, Pacific, and the two limited partnerships — Rock Castle Drilling Fund LP and Rock Castle Drilling Fund II LP. Hilton’s securities offerings were not registered with the SEC as required under the federal securities laws.
In the SEC’s complaint, there were allegations against Hilton, Pacific, and another company that was controlled by Hilton called New Horizon Publishing Inc. Through Pacific and New Horizon, Hilton sold $2.5 million worth of investments in oil drilling projects sponsored by United States Energy Corp. while deceiving investors about his identity, the anticipated returns on the investments, the amount of oil being produced by U.S. Energy’s wells, and the existence of natural gas wells.
The SEC’s complaint adds that Hilton changed his name from Joseph Yurkin late last year following a final judgment for fraud in a previous SEC enforcement action against him for securities offerings he made through another company he worked for — Homeland Communications Corp.
It was reported that the SEC is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, financial penalties, and permanent injunctions against Hilton and his entities.
If you or a family member were sold oil and gas offerings by Joseph Hilton (aka Joseph Yurkin) or any of the above companies, and experienced financial losses, contact an attorney at Soreide Law Group for a free consultation on how to recover your investment losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
broker receiving ill-gotten gains · broker theft from customers · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers misrepresenting themselves · deception by broker · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · Homeland Communications Corp · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · investment fraud · Joseph Hilton alias Joseph Yurkin · Joseph Hilton securities fraud · Joseph Hilton West Palm Beach FL · Joseph Yurkin West Palm Beach FL · Lars K. Soreide · misrepresentations and omissions by brokers · New Horizon Publishing Inc · oil and gas projects fraud · oil drilling project fraud · Pacific Northwestern Energy LLC · Rock Castle Drilling Fund II LP · Rock Castle Drilling Fund LP · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud lawyer · solicit investments in oil and gas · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · United States Energy Corp · unregistered security
27
FINRA Improves ‘BrokerCheck’ Capabilities
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority announced that it has added features to BrokerCheck to help users more easily access broker-dealer and investment adviser information. Many of the changes implemented by FINRA address recommendations made in a January, 2011. study by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reported FINRA in an article on their website.
BrokerCheck users now have:
1. Centralized access to licensing and registration information on current and former brokers and brokerage firms, and investment adviser representatives and investment adviser firms;
2. The ability to search for and locate a financial services professional based on main office and branch locations, and the ability to conduct ZIP code radius searches (in increments of 5, 15 or 25 miles); and
3. Access to expanded educational content available on BrokerCheck, including new help icons that clarify commonly referenced terms throughout the system and within BrokerCheck reports.
FINRA Executive Vice President, Derek Linden, of Registration and Disclosure, said, “BrokerCheck is the go-to source for investors to find up-to-date accurate information about their broker or potential brokers. FINRA is constantly looking for new ways to make BrokerCheck easier to use and to make the information more accessible to investors.”
BrokerCheck is available to the public at no charge on FINRA’s website, www.finra.org/brokercheck.
Securities Attorney, Lars Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, has represented clients nationwide before FINRA. If you have sustained investment losses due to your stock broker or financial advisor’s recommendations call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses. To speak with an attorney call: 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
brokercheck improvements · BrokerCheck usages · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · find BrokerCheck FINRA · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · FINRA brokercheck · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · Lars Soreide · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · Stock fraud lawyer
18
Connecticut Broker, Stephen Blankenship, Charged by SEC for Stealing Investor Funds
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Stephen B. Blankenship, of New Fairfield, Connecticut, and Deer Hill Financial Group, LLC, a Connecticut limited liability company under Blankenship’s control, with a scheme to defraud investors. The SEC’s Complaint alleges that, from at least 2002 through November 2011, Blankenship misappropriated at least $600,000 from at least 12 brokerage customers by falsely representing that he would invest their funds in securities through defendant Deer Hill.
The SEC alleges that until November 2011, Blankenship was a registered representative of Vanderbilt Securities, LLC, a registered broker-dealer based in Melville, New York. Blankenship lied to his brokerage customers and in many instances, lured customers to withdraw money from their brokerage accounts with promises that they could obtain a greater rate of return by investing through Deer Hill, according to the complaint. The complaint also alleges that Blankenship assured his customers that he would invest their money in established securities such as publicly traded mutual funds. When customers requested account statements, Blankenship provided the customers with fictitious statements from Deer Hill that falsely represented that Blankenship had invested their money in a variety of investments.
Blankenship never invested the customers’ money, according to the SEC’s Complaint. Blankenship used the customers’ money instead for personal expenses, business expenses and to make Ponzi-like payments to other customers who requested a return of all or part of their investment.
If you’ve experienced financial losses due to your investments with Stephen Blankenship or another broker/dealer, call Soreide Law Group for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses at: 888-760-6552, or you may visit our website and complete the online form at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
Blankenship misappropriation of funds · Blankenship Ponzi Scheme · broker theft from customers · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers luring customers to other firms · Deer Hill Financial Group LLC · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities fraud lawyer · securities lawyer · Stephen B Blankenship New Fairfield Connecticut · Stephen Blankenship charged by SEC · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · Vanderbilt Securities LLC Blankenship
15
FINRA Warns of Sharing Commissions with Unregistered Individuals and Providing False Information to Firms
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
(FINRA publishes a quarterly review to provide firms with a sampling of recent disciplinary actions involving misconduct by registered representatives. This sample includes settled matters and decisions in litigated cases (National Adjudicatory Council (NAC) decisions and SEC decisions in FINRA cases). These summaries call attention to, and remind registered representatives and member firms of, specific conduct that violates FINRA rules and may result in disciplinary action.)
This information appeared on FINRA’s website, October, 2012.
Sharing Commissions With an Unregistered Individual and Providing False Information to Firm
FINRA settled a matter involving a registered representative who shared commissions with an unregistered person who operated a business out of the same office space, and misled his member firm as to whether any other businesses operated out of the branch office location.
This unregistered individual had been associated with a member firm and worked with the registered representative in years prior. He had attempted to associate with the registered representative’s firm, but the firm was unwilling to allow him to associate because of his disciplinary history. During a period of 16 months, the unregistered person conducted research and provided the registered representative with stock recommendations that the registered representative relayed to his own customers. In exchange for the stock recommendations, the registered representative paid the unregistered person approximately 40 percent of his brokerage commissions, totaling approximately $255,000, without disclosing the commission payment arrangement to the member firm. FINRA found that that the representative’s conduct violated NASD Rule 2420 (dealing with non-members) and FINRA Rule 2010 (ethical standards).
FINRA found that during this period, the registered representative also submitted a false and misleading compliance questionnaire to his member firm. On the questionnaire, the registered representative denied that any other businesses were located in the branch office when, in fact, the unregistered individual operated his business out of the same office. By signing and submitting an incorrect compliance questionnaire to the member firm, the registered representative caused the firm’s books and records to be incorrect, and he concealed from the firm that the person it previously had rejected for association was in fact working out of firm office space. FINRA concluded that the registered representative’s actions violated NASD Conduct Rule 3110* (books and records) and FINRA Rule 2010 (ethical standards). In light of these violations, FINRA suspended the representative in all capacities for one year and fined him $20,000.
(This ends the FINRA article.)
Securities Lawyer, Lars K. Soreide, of Soreide Law Group, PLLC, represents clients nationwide. For a free consultation on how to potentially recover your financial losses call: 888-760-6552, or you may visit our website and complete the online form at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers sharing commissions with unregistered individual · Ethical Standards by FINRA · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra lawyer · FINRA Rule 2010 · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · NAC · NASD Conduct Rule 3110 · providing false information to firms by brokers · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · Securities and Exchange Commission litigation · securities lawyer · Stock fraud lawyer
8
VelocityShares 2x Long VIX Short Term Exchange Notes
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is looking into the VelocityShares 2x Long VIX Short Term Exchange Note, managed by Credit Suisse Group AG, which had about $700 million in assets before the decline, according to an article in the Wall Street Journal. The Massachusetts’s securities regulator and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are investigating the ETN’s loss of nearly 60% of it’s value.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Secretary of the Commonwealth, William Galvin, submitted a written request on March 23 to Credit Suisse for information and documents related to every purchase of shares in the VelocityShares 2x Long VIX Short Term Exchange note from Feb. 20 to March 23.
This comes amid concern over trading in the ETN. The Credit Suisse ETN, which is designed to track stock-market volatility, plunged even though market volatility was little changed.
According to WSJ, the confusion underscores the risky nature of exchange-traded notes. While hedge funds are usually the most active traders of the securities, the notes have become more popular with smaller investors, in part because they are low cost and easy to trade.
If you experienced financial losses due to your broker/dealer’s recommendation of VelocityShares 2x Long VIX Short Term Exchange Notes, call Soreide Law Group for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your losses at: 888-760-6552, or you may visit our website and complete the online form at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
brokers recommending risky investments · Credit Suisse ETN · Credit Suisse Group AG · ETN · exchange traded notes · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra securities arbitration lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · high risk investments · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · risky ETNs · SEC · SEC investigates VelocityShares 2x Long VIX Short Term Exchange Notes · Securities and Exchange Commission · Unsuitable investments to elderly · VelocityShares 2x Long VIX Short Term Exchange Notes
25
FINRA Wants Brokers Records More Accessible to Investors
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority also known as FINRA, is hoping to make information about brokers more accessible to the investors, which they feel would hold those in the industry more accountable for their actions.
In September, FINRA voted to submit proposals to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that would make information in its BrokerCheck system easier for investors to find, and keep permanent the records of dismissed investment-related civil actions.
FINRA’s BrokerCheck is a free online tool that allows access to the professional backgrounds of about 1.3 million current and former FINRA-registered brokers and 17,400 current and former FINRA-registered brokerage firms. This system is accessed via FINRA’s website.
FINRA proposed amendments which would require all member firms to include a reference and a link to BrokerCheck on their own company home pages and related websites for all FINRA-registered brokers. There is an amendement to keep investment-related civil actions that have been dismissed by a settlement agreement on permanent public file in the BrokerCheck system as well. The amendments also would allow for downloading of BrokerCheck information as approved by the board. FINRA is hoping to make BrokerCheck easier for all investors to use.
Soreide Law Group, PLLC, represents clients nationwide. If you have experienced financial losses due to your broker/dealer or financial professional’s recommendations, call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your financial losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
Broker failure to respond to FINRA requsest for information · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · Finra adding more information on broker to BrokerCheck · FINRA arbitration · FINRA brokercheck · finra lawyer · FINRA makes broker info easy · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · how to use BrokerCheck · inadequate supervisory procedures by broker/dealers · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · supervisory failures
13
Did You Invest in Alpine Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD)?
Comments off · Posted by Securities Lawyer in FINRA
Soreide Law Group is currently investigating Alpine Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). There were nearly 220 million shares sold to the public with a Closed-End Fund trading 31.45% above its Net Asset Value. It may soon be no longer one of the more favored of the Alpine funds.
Alpine has recently disclosed that they have received a Wells Notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relating to shares of initial public offerings and the failure to approve, review, and adequately implement some of their written policies and procedures. This may be seen as a red flag and a reason for concern.
Soreide Law Group, PLLC, represents clients nationwide. Call for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your financial losses. To speak with an attorney call 888-760-6552, or visit our website at: http://www.securitieslawyer.com.
Alpine Fund · Alpine Total Dynamic Dividend Fund · AOD · brokerage supervisory deficiencies · brokers recommending risky investments · closed end fund loss · closed-end fund market · closed-end funds · failure to approve stock · failure to follow written supervisory polices · failure to supervise brokers · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra lawyer · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · high risk investments · Lars K. Soreide Soreide Law Group · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · unsuitable short-term sales of closed-end funds · written policies in brokerage
