ALEXANDER INVESTMENT SERVICES CO. was censured and fined $25,000.00 as part of a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Their main office location is in Louisville, Kentucky.
Without admitting or denying FINRA’s findings, ALEXANDER INVESTMENT SERVICES consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it allegedly failed to comply with Reg BI’s compliance and conflict of interest obligations.
FINRA’s findings stated that ALEXANDER INVESTMENT SERVICES’ written policies and procedures allegedly contained no provisions specifically relating to the obligations set forth in Reg BI.
ALEXANDER INVESTMENT SERVICES later updated its policies and procedures, which remain in effect, but they discuss Reg BI only in general terms, without addressing conflicts of interest or Reg BI’s specific requirements for acting in the best interest of retail customers, according to the FINRA report.
The report goes on to say that ALEXANDER INVESTMENT SERVICES’ WSPS (Written Supervisory Procedures) do not designate the principal responsible for Reg BI compliance or detail the supervisory steps and reviews that should be undertaken by that principal, including the frequency of those reviews or how such reviews should be conducted or evidenced.
The date initiated and the date of resolution was October 20, 2025. The firm was censured and fined $25,000.00.
The SEC's Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 establishes a "best interest" standard of conduct for broker/dealers and associated persons when they make a recommendation to a retail customer of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities, including recommendations of types of accounts. According to the SEC, investment advisers, broker/dealers, and their financial professionals need to understand the investments and investment strategies on which they provide advice and recommendations before advising on or recommending them to retail investors. This includes developing a sufficient understanding of the potential risks, rewards, and costs of the investment or investment strategy to have a reasonable basis to believe that the recommendation or advice could be in a retail investor’s best interest. Without this understanding, firms and their financial professionals cannot have a reasonable basis to believe that their recommendation or advice aligns with a retail investor’s investment profile in a way that satisfies their obligations to make a recommendation or provide advice that is in the specific investor’s best interest.
To discuss this article or any other securities issues contact Soreide Law Group and speak to an experienced securities lawyer at no cost: 888-760-6552.
Soreide Law Group represents clients nationwide before FINRA.
Soreide Law Group has filed a FINRA arbitration on behalf of our clients (Claimants) against: CONCORDE INVESTMENTS SERVICES, LLC, and BERTHEL, FISHER & COMPANY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC (Respondents). The Claimants are in their late 70s, retired, and according to the lawsuit, were not looking to take any unnecessary risks with their retirement savings. The Claimants […]
THEODORE WILLIAM BYRER (THEODORE W BYRER, TED BYRER) was registered as a broker with MORGAN STANLEY of Indianapolis, Indiana, from 11/11/2013 - 04/20/2023. He was most recently registered with INTERNATIONAL ASSETS ADVISORY, INC of Westfield, Indiana, from 05/09/2023 - 09/17/2024. According to his BrokerCheck CRD report, dated 7/23/2026, THEODORE W BYRER was suspended for 14 […]
MARK LAWRENCE SULLIVAN (MARK SULLIVAN, MARK L SULLIVAN), formerly with UBS Wealth Management USA in New York City, was fined $10,000 and suspended for three months by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over allegations that he traded in customers’ accounts without the proper approval. Sullivan was previously registered both as a broker and as an […]
Phone:
Fax: 1-954-760-6553
Email: info@securitieslawyer.com