The Hidden Dangers of Covered Call Strategies: Why "Safe" Income Can Cost You Millions
When investors hold large, concentrated stock positions—especially in tech stocks that have seen massive growth—they often look for ways to generate extra income without selling their shares. Frequently, brokers suggest a Covered Call strategy as a "safe" way to earn yield. This approach is often recommended even on an otherwise non-dividend-paying stock.
However, at Soreide Law Group, we are seeing an increasing number of cases. In these cases, this "safe" strategy has resulted in financial disaster for investors.
What is a Covered Call?
A covered call involves selling the right for someone else to buy your stock at a specific price (the strike price) by a certain date. In exchange, you receive a "premium" (cash upfront). In fact, brokers often frame this as "getting paid to wait" or "creating a dividend."
The "Trap": Low Basis and Massive Tax Bills
The danger arises when you have a low-cost basis in a stock. If you bought a stock years ago at a fraction of its current price, selling it would trigger a massive capital gains tax bill.
When you sell a covered call, you are essentially shorting the upside of your own stock. If the stock price skyrockets past your strike price, you are "trapped." You have two painful choices:
Let the shares go: Your stock is "called away" at the lower strike price. You lose out on all the recent gains, and you are hit with a massive, unexpected tax bill on the sale.
Buy your way out: To keep your shares and avoid the tax hit, you have to pay the market rate to "close out" the option.
Real-World Consequences: The Morgan Stanley Case
We recently filed a case against Morgan Stanley involving this exact scenario. A client held a significant position in Meta (formerly Facebook). The broker sold covered calls when the stock was around $200. As Meta climbed toward $500 and beyond, the client was stuck.
To avoid losing his shares and triggering a devastating tax event, the client ended up spending over $1 million just to close out the position. This is the "hidden" cost that many brokers fail to explain. When they pitch these strategies as low-risk, they often do not disclose this expense.
Was Your Risk Properly Explained?
If you are comfortable selling your stock at a specific price, covered calls can be a legitimate tool. But if your broker failed to explain the tax implications or the risk of losing your position during a bull market, they may be liable for your losses.
If you’ve lost money or paid exorbitant fees to save a concentrated stock position because of a covered call strategy, Soreide Law Group is here to help. We represent investors nationwide in FINRA arbitrations.
Contact us today for a free case evaluation at (888) 760-6552 or visit our website at SecuritiesLawyer.com.
Pending customer claims on BrokerCheck name Michael Graham (CRD 3263494) and list LPL Financial as the firm. Each claim is pending and unproven, and no arbitrator has ruled on any of them. The customers allege that Graham misrepresented guaranteed principal and returns on a secured loan related to a real estate deal.
An SEC decision involving Titan Securities (CRD 131392) of Plano, Texas became final on August 7, 2026, according to FINRA's October 2026 Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions report. The decision fined the firm $50,000. The record lists the firm as JTA Securities Management, Inc. dba Titan Securities.
Every settled customer dispute on Peter Maller's BrokerCheck report names Lincoln Financial as the firm. Maller holds CRD number 2322403. The newest dispute, filed on March 5, 2024, settled on August 15, 2024 for $12,500 against alleged damages of $50,000. The claimants alleged that the representative represented an oil and gas investment as safe.
Contact us Nationwide USA
2401 E. Atlantic Blvd., Suite 305, Pompano Beach, FL 33062