Ernesto Chavez (CRD: 4315877) faces a new pending claim on BrokerCheck over an investment made in 2018. The customer alleges $180,000 in damages, and no arbitrator has ruled on the claim.
EVAN JAY ADELGLASS, according to FINRA’s BrokerCheck, has been registered both as a broker and as an investment advisor with LPL FINANCIAL LLC, in Ansonia, Connecticut, since August 31, 2005.
According to BrokerCheck, available on FINRA’s website to the public, EVAN JAY ADELGLASS, has been in the securities industry for 30 years and was listed with 10 firms. Adelglass has 3 disclosures on his FINRA CRD report. All 3 disclosures are, “Customer Disputes.” One dispute from 2002, with the allegations of, “FLORIDA RESIDENT CONPLAINS THAT UPON REVIEWING JOINT AND IRA ACCOUNTS AFTER HER HUSBANDS DEATH SHE DISCOVERED THAT HIGHLY SPECULATIVE INVESTMENTS HAD BEEN PURCHASED WHICH WERE UNSUITABLE FOR FINANCIAL STATUS. ALSO CONPLAINS THAT TRANSACTIONS NOT AUTHORISED IN HER IRA ACCOUNT. ACTIVITY OCCURREDE BETWEEN 1999 AND 2001. SEEKS $283,677, REPRESENTING VALUE LOSS PLUS INTEREST,” was denied.
There was a “Customer Dispute” filed against EVAN JAY ADELGLASS on 10/02/24 that is currently pending. The allegations are, “Customer alleges that investments made were unsuitable for the customer's investment objectives and risk tolerance. Time period: 2020-2024.” The damage amount requested is $600,000.00. Adelglass denies the allegations.
On 10/07/24, another “Customer Dispute” was filed against EVAN JAY ADELGLASS, with allegations of, “Customers allege that investments made were unsuitable for the customers' investment objectives and risk tolerance. Time frame: 2021-2024.” This dispute is pending. The damage amount requested is $330,000.00. Adelglass denies the allegations.
On the SEC’s website, they state that on June 5, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted Regulation Best Interest, which established a new standard of conduct under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for broker/dealers and those associated persons of a broker/dealer when making a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer. When making such a recommendation to a retail customer, they must act in the best interest of the customer at the time the recommendation is made, without placing their financial or other interest ahead of the retail customer’s interests.
To discuss this article or other securities issues, please contact Soreide Law Group and speak to an experienced securities lawyer at no cost: 888-760-6552.
Soreide Law Group represents clients nationally before FINRA on a contingency fee basis, no fee to you if no recovery.
Ernesto Chavez (CRD: 4315877) faces a new pending claim on BrokerCheck over an investment made in 2018. The customer alleges $180,000 in damages, and no arbitrator has ruled on the claim.
William Tunink (CRD: 2738224) settled a customer claim for $299,000 on August 11, 2026, according to his BrokerCheck report. The customer alleged that he obtained loans from the customer, and that some of the money went into an investment.
Tony Barouti (CRD: 3031995) faces a pending $230,400 customer claim, according to his BrokerCheck report. He says the allegations in it are false. His report also lists SEC administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings from August 2025.
Phone:
Fax: 1-954-760-6553
Email: [email protected]