Zero-coupon Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) sit near the high end of the leverage scale for real estate sold to exchange investors. Most of the purchase price comes from a mortgage. The investor's cash often buys only a thin slice of equity.
Zero-coupon Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) sit near the high end of the leverage scale for real estate sold to exchange investors. Most of the purchase price comes from a mortgage. The investor's cash often buys only a thin slice of equity.
This post explains the structure in plain terms. It also covers how a FINRA arbitration claim works when a broker recommended one of these trusts.
A Delaware statutory trust lets many investors own fractional interests in one property. Zero-coupon Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) usually hold a single building leased long term to one tenant. The tenant's rent goes almost entirely to the lender. As a result, investors receive little or no cash during the hold, much like a bond that pays no coupon.
Buyers often come to these trusts during a like-kind exchange. Because the debt runs so high, the trust helps an exchange buyer replace the mortgage they paid off on the property they sold. Any payoff comes later, when the trust sells the building and the lender collects its balance first.
This video walks through how Zero-coupon Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) work and what investors should watch for.
Debt magnifies every change in a property's value. In Zero-coupon Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs), a modest drop in value can erase much of the equity. If the single tenant leaves or stops paying, the trust has no other rent to cover the loan.
Liquidity is thin as well. Interests in a DST generally have no public market, and trust terms usually bar new capital or new loans. Investors also can owe tax on income they never receive in cash, since the rent pays down the loan.
Fees add another layer. Sponsors and selling firms take commissions and offering costs at the start, which shrinks the equity before the property earns anything.
An investor who bought one of these trusts on a broker's advice can file a FINRA arbitration claim against the broker and the brokerage firm. Suitability is usually the starting point. A broker needs a reasonable basis to believe a product fits the customer's goals, risk tolerance and need for cash.
Other theories come up too. A claim can allege that the broker misstated the risks or left them out. It can also allege that the firm failed to supervise the sale or skipped its own due diligence on the offering. Under the best interest standard, a broker must also weigh costs and reasonable alternatives before recommending Zero-coupon Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs).
When we review a claim like this, we start with the exchange paperwork and the offering memorandum. Then we compare what the investor heard with what those documents disclosed.
FINRA member firms must supervise their brokers, including the recommendations they make. If you bought Zero-coupon Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) through a broker and want to talk it over, Soreide Law Group can review it with you. Call (888) 760-6552 or contact us online. Because these claims go to FINRA arbitration rather than a local court, we handle them for investors nationwide, on a contingency fee basis. Here is how FINRA arbitration works.
This post summarizes public documents about Zero-coupon Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) listed under Sources, as of November 7, 2026. Allegations in a regulatory complaint or a customer claim are claims, not findings, and a settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing. Nothing here states that any particular investor was harmed. Investors with questions about how a product was sold to them can have their account reviewed at no cost.
Zero-coupon Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) sit near the high end of the leverage scale for real estate sold to exchange investors. Most of the purchase price comes from a mortgage. The investor's cash often buys only a thin slice of equity.
A variable annuity dispute naming Mario Rudolph (CRD 6169121) settled on August 20, 2026, for $82,504, BrokerCheck shows. The disclosure lists $61,411 in alleged damages. A settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing.
In 2010, the SEC instituted public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against Brett Messing (CRD 2077288), BrokerCheck shows. Without admitting or denying the findings, the respondents consented to a finding that they willfully violated Rule 105 of Regulation M.
Phone:
Fax: 1-954-760-6553
Email: [email protected]